Carlsen's been judged for the cause of his loss.
skirts between Niequemann and Carlsen on 19/9 were waiting for the first two embers met since Sinquefield Cup two weeks ago. Niemann took the white army, pulled good d4, and Carlsen replied with the f6 codes, the young man of America to second country, but right then Carlsen pressed the lost.
All the commentators and the surrender to the tournament were suddenly surprised at Carlsen's actions. General David Howell thinks this "Never had a precedent with a chess King, or a prime prime minister, not to speak of the man Carlsen." "We are living in a strange age, too unusual", Howell hits it hard. "But I just want to see two men fighting each other."
On the Norway TV2, General Jon Ludvig Hammer reacted to Carlsen's behavior. Hammer was working with Carlsen when this individual was in the middle of the 2013 flag, but this time, I'm assuming the action is unacceptable. Hammer's the best course of sports is the primary, Hammer said. "Carlsen deserves to be punished for doing that."
Scientific professor and Ken Regan's computer technology also thinks this is a "pity." Regan is considered an important voice in the discovery of chess. He thinks Carlsen may not be interested in this loser game, because he's always standing in Top 8, but "given" to Niemann for three points, that results could help the U.S. players get real.
If Niemann hadn On this panel, eight high-ranking points will go to the end, and the other eight are out.
Carlsen doesn't explain anything about the groundwork that lost Niemann. The number one world also told Norway that you refused to interview the rest of the game at the beginning. Your father - Mr. Henrik Carlsen - he also canceled the appointment with TV2.
The Carlsen lost in the second country was supposed to imply "Niemann was cheating," without telling the truth. General Alejandro Ramirez said, "Clearly Carlsen wants to imply there's something wrong with Niemann." And the former chess queen Susan Polgar says, "Clearly Carlsen is protesting with this act."
But the pros are also in need of five times the world champion giving evidence. General Simon Williams, Ramirez and international legate Jovanka Houska thinks Carlsen can't act like that. "He's not supposed to be cheating on Niemann anymore, you have to come up with your evidence," you say.
The first surrenders would be a lighter reaction to Carlsen's decision. The crew of eight worlds Levon Aronian says you "understand Carlsen's decision". I don't know how to get through this, Armenian American. "But Niemann is not the deadliest of the online fight, this will be a lesson for Niemann."
And the seven worlds of the Anish Giri saying, "clearly Carlsen has no evidence, but he's completely confident that Niemann cheated." "I just don't know when Carlsen thinks Niemann cheated," Giri says. "Niemann was banned for fraud at the online Prize, maybe Carlsen would have been able to fight the man who cheated like that wasn't credible."
Carlsen once said that you could quickly find out if a fraud mastermind. "The water or the accuracy in the water of another computer, you say.
About what Carlsen has been punished for his lost cause, Director Champions Chess Tour Arne Horvei told TV2 that they're working on this case, and it's gonna take a lot of time.
Carlsen's Group owns Chess24- the Champions Chess Tour. When asked if this would help Carlsen benefit from this, Mr. Horvei said, "Carlsen is an alternate and we just focus on that."
The last time Carlsen lost, he was at the tournament he started by Chessable Masters 20, but it was a good gesture. In your game with Ding Liren, the Chinese commander lost his network and lost. In the next round, Carlsen left behind in the fourth country and begged to lose. Carlsen's operations got the fair-play-of-FIDE at the end of the year.
This time, Carlsen's lost initiative is no longer going to be involved.
